# Belgium Has Regions and Communities, and the Difference Is the Whole Argument > Two overlapping sets of federated entities, drawn on different principles, share power with the federal state. Once the distinction is clear, most Belgian politics becomes readable. - Source: Belgium Crown - Canonical URL: https://belgiumcrown.com/article/belgium-federal-architecture-regions-communities - Author: Mathieu Vandenberghe - Section: Politics - Published: 2026-08-01T11:30:00.000Z - Updated: 2026-08-01T11:30:00.000Z - Tags: Federalism, Flanders, Wallonia, Constitution --- Belgium became a federal state formally in 1993, at the end of a sequence of reforms that began in 1970. What it produced is not the tidy map federalism usually implies. There are three regions, defined by territory: Flanders, Wallonia and Brussels-Capital. There are also three communities, defined by language: Flemish, French speaking and German speaking. They overlap, and they are not subdivisions of each other. The split follows a real disagreement about what devolution was for. Flemish demands were largely cultural, concerned with language, education and broadcasting, which suits a community defined by the people who speak a language wherever they live. Walloon demands were largely economic, concerned with industrial policy and employment in a region whose heavy industry was declining, which suits an entity defined by territory. Rather than choose, the country built both. Flanders then simplified its own half by merging its region and its community into a single parliament and government sitting in Brussels. The French speaking side did not, which is why Wallonia and the French Community remain distinct institutions with separate competences, and why a Brussels resident can be governed by a regional body for transport and a community body for schools. Brussels is where the design shows its strain. It is a region in its own right, officially bilingual, and a majority French speaking city that hosts the Flemish institutions. Community competences there are exercised by commissions rather than by a single authority, which is why the governance of a school or a hospital in Brussels can depend on which language regime it operates under. The practical consequence is that Belgium has several governments and no hierarchy between them. Federated entities are not subordinate to the federal state; each is sovereign within its competences, and disputes go to the Constitutional Court rather than up a chain of command. That is why Belgian politics so often looks like negotiation between governments rather than administration within one. It is not a malfunction. It is the design. --- Originally published by Belgium Crown. Free to cite with attribution and a link to https://belgiumcrown.com/article/belgium-federal-architecture-regions-communities.